Tuesday, April 15, 2014
A change could come to Berkeley County’s enforcement of political signs in public right of ways this month.
During Monday’s regular meeting of the Justice and Public Safety Committee, council heard from the county’s planning director, the Berkeley County GOP chair, and a citizen, who questioned the constitutionality of the county’s ordinance regulating erection of political signs in public space.
The county does not allow signs in the public right of ways but, in 2005, created an exemption that said political signs can be placed along roadways within 45 days of an election and would not be subject to setback requirements if it pertained to a candidate or ballot measure. The county does not regulate signs on private property.
No action was taken during the meeting. However, council talked about convening a special meeting April 28 to pass a resolution to halt enforcement of what defines a political sign.
County GOP Chair Terry Hardesty said there is legal precedent for action if county staff removed noncompliant signs. Another citizen commenter said she would file a suit if her signs were removed. Under the current ordinance, an example includes the RINO (Republican in Name Only) signs that are placed in the public right-of-way next to a Republican candidate’s sign.
Planning Director Eric Greenway also questioned the legality of the county’s ordinance.
“I’m not sure if much of this ordinance would stand up in court,” he said. Greenway said he’s particularly concerned over the 45-day restriction. He added that his staff would have to enforce whatever ordinance is on the books so it can’t be accused of selective enforcement.
In other Berkeley County committee news, the Justice and Public Safety Committee of council approved a budget request seeking an additional 16 corrections officers at Hill-Finklea Detention Center. The request will continue into budget talks in the county.
Last month, Sheriff Wayne DeWitt made the request for the extra staff. He said his employees are working mandatory overtime and safety is a concern. The increased staff would allow more space to open up at the center. The additional officers would be a $775,000 recurring expense.
Berkeley Independent is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Berkeley Independent.